|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES
WORKSHOP OUTLINE 1. We all have Stories 2. Stories for the Environment 3. Finding Good Stories NOTES FOR FACILITATORS 1. The degree of curriculum choice and flexibility for teachers can
be very high in certain education systems and countries. However, syllabus
and examination requirements can exert a strong influence in other education
systems, especially for secondary schools. Workshop facilitators will
need to adapt activities and emphasise different aspects of the workshop
according to the curriculum contexts and needs of participants.
MATERIALS REQUIRED A. Provided Overhead Transparencies OHT 1 Objectives of the Workshop OHT 2 Workshop Outline OHT 3 The Importance of Storytelling OHT 4 The Objectives of Environmental Education OHT 5 Causes of Environmental Problems OHT 6 Mechanisms for Denying Environmental Problems OHT 7 The Purposes of Traditional Stories OHT 8 Powerful Lessons Stories can Teach OHT 9 Why Indigenous Stories? OHT 10 Indigenous Stories and Messages OHT 11 Objectives and Activities for Using the Monk's Story in Teaching OHT 12 The Monk's Six Principles for Living Sustainably OHT 13 Principles for Using Guest Storytellers Effectively OHT 14 Reviewing the Workshop Resources Resource 1 Stories for the Environment Resource 2 The Monk's Story Resource 3 Activities Based on the Monk's Story Resource 4 Plan for Using a Story in Teaching Readings Reading 1 Telling Stories Well B. To be obtained This workshop requires the facilitator to select a range of local stories. It is important that this be done at the local level to ensure the local cultural relevance of the workshop. The facilitator should prepare a personal story about an experience from his/her life in which the environment has been significant, e.g. memories of childhood places, the place where you grew up, holiday places, etc., and changes to such important places. The story should be selected and told in order to help participants think of the importance of stories about the environment in their lives. Alternatively, a guest storyteller (e.g. a skilled colleague, an indigenous elder, or a member of a local cultural group - see Activity 6) could be invited to tell such a story to help begin the workshop. The facilitator should make a collection of different sorts of stories and story forms to display at the workshop. Colleagues such as educational librarians and lecturers in language studies, history, culture, religion and social studies have always proven to be most helpful in compiling collections of stories. These may be stories about local society and environments, traditional or indigenous stories or stories from other cultures. These stories could be in book form - or comics, poems, videos, films and audio-cassette. These should be brought to the workshop and set up as a display for participants. If such a collection is not possible, facilitators should select at least 3-4 stories - preferably expressed in different forms such as tales, poetry, etc. - to use in this activity. The facilitator could provide examples of indigenous stories - or, using the suggestions in Activity 6 - invite the assistance of indigenous guest story tellers. This activity is based upon a contemporary story of Sri Lankan village that developed a sustainable lifestyle with the assistance of an ecologically-minded monk. A local success story could be selected to replace this story to bring increased local relevance if the facilitator wishes. Indigenous storytellers, singers, dancers, puppeteers, etc. could be invited to assist with this and other activities in the workshop.
ADDITIONAL READING Bardwell, L. (1991) Success stories: Imagery by example, Journal of Environmental Education, 23, 5-10. Barton, B. (1986) Tell Me Another, Pembroke Publishers, Toronto. Campbell, J. (1988) The Power of Myth, Doubleday, London. Gersie, A. (1992) Earth Tales: Storytelling in Times of Change, Green Print, London. Gersie, A. and King, N. (1990) Storymaking in Education and Therapy, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London. Kane, S. (1994) Wisdom of the Mythtellers, Broodwin Press, New York Knudston, P. and Suzuki, D. (1992) Wisdom of the Elders, Unwin and Allen, Sydney. Livo, N. and Rietz, S. (1986) Storytelling: Process and Practice, Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, Colorado. Livo, N. and Rietz, S. (1991) Storytelling Folklore Sourcebook, Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, Colorado. Sawyer, R. (1986) The Way of the Storyteller, Penguin, Harmondsworth. De Young, R. and Monroe, M. (1996) Some fundamentals of engaging stories, Environmental Education Research, 2(2), 171-187. The facilitator should make a collection of local and national stories, perhaps with the assistance of an educational librarian, to make a display for participants.
ACTIVITIES 1. We all have Stories The purpose of this introductory activity is to help participants identify the important roles that stories play in everyone's lives and the reasons for using storytelling as a teaching method. It is best to begin the workshop by telling the group a story about the significance of some aspect of the environment to you. This could be a story about the place where you were born and grew up - and how you felt when you returned to it after many years away. It could also be a story about a favourite holiday place, or tree, or forest, or bird or animal - and how it came to be important to you. This story needs to be prepared or practised in advance. Reading 1 provides some general guidelines on how to tell stories confidently. Facilitators who do not feel confident to tell such a story could invite an experienced colleague (or a guest story teller) to tell such a story or maybe play an audiotape of a story to the group.
2. Stories for the Environment
Stories can be found in all sorts of places - and may take many different forms. Stories may be found in books, novels, poetry and songs. Stories are also told through cultural forms such as dance, puppetry and theatre. The purpose of this activity is to help participants recognise this great range of sources of stories. Unfortunately, in a module such as this which has been written to be adapted for use in many different countries, it is not possible to provide a list of such sources. This is why it was suggested in the introductory part of this module that facilitators should make a collection of stories and story forms in order to set up a display at the workshop.
Note to Facilitators
5. Using Success Stories of the Environment Traditional societies are not the only ones who care for the earth. Many contemporary groups are working actively to protect and conserve the environment also. It is important in environmental education that students hear the success stories from such groups in order to learn the tactics they use and to derive inspiration for their own activities. The purpose of this activity is to provide an example of one such success story and to provide an example of ways in which the story could be integrated into a sequence of learning activities.
Note to Facilitators If time is available, an optional activity now would be to ask participants to select one of the stories you identified in Activity 3 or one of the indigenous stories from Activity 4; and to plan an outline of a series of lessons using the story. Headings for the outline are provided on Resource 4.
Review the key themes of the module using OHT 14. It is based upon the objectives of the module.
OHT 1 Objectives of the Workshop
OHT 2 Workshop Outline
OHT 3 The Importance of Storytelling Source: Adapted from Gersie, A. (1992) Earthtales: Storytelling in Times of Change, Green Print, London, p.1; Livo, N. and Rietz, S. (1986) Storytelling: Process and Practice, Libraries Unlimited Inc., Colorado, p.2.
(Adapted from Gersie 1992)
(Livo and Rietz 1986)
OHT 4 The Objectives of Environmental Education Source: Adapted from UNESCO-UNEP (1978) The Tbilisi Declaration, Connect, III (i), p. 3; and UNESCO and Australian Association for Environmental Education (1993) Final Repot of UNESCO Asia-Pacific Region on Overcoming the Barriers to Environmental Education through Teacher Education, Griffith University, 4-9 July, p. 34.
Causes of Environmental Problems Source: Gersie, A. (1992) Earthtales: Storytelling in Times of Change, Green Print, London, p. 27.
OHT 6 Mechanisms for Denying Environmental Problems Source: Adapted from Gersie, A. (1992) Earthtales: Storytelling in Times of Change, Green Print, London, p.28.
OHT 7 The Purposes of Traditional Stories Source: Gersie, A. (1992) Earthtales: Storytelling in Times of Change, Green Print, London, p. 29.
Powerful Lessons Stories Can Teach Source: Gersie, A. (1992) Earthtales: Storytelling in Times of Change, Green Print, London, pp. 28, 30.
OHT 9 Why Indigenous Stories? Source: Taylor, K. and Neidje, B., eds. (1989) Story About Feeling, Magabala Books, Broome; and Williamson-Fien, J., ed. (1993) Sithembiso-Nyon's Story, in Women's Voices, Global Education Centre, Brisbane, p. 65.
(Taylor)
(Sithembiso Nyoni)
OHT 10 Indigenous Stories and Messages
OHT 11 Objectives for Using the Monk's Story in Teaching
OHT 12 The Monk's Six Principles for Living Sustainably Source: Adapted from Beddis, R. and Johnson, C., eds. (1988) Only One Earth: A Multimedia Education Pack, World Wide Fund for Nature, Godalming. Surrey. 1. Harmony with Nature 2. Quality of Life 3. Self Reliance 4. Variety and Diversity 5. Small is Beautiful 6. Co-operation and Peace
OHT 13 Principles for Using guest Storytellers Effectively
OHT 14 Reviewing the Workshop How confident are you of doing the following tasks: A = Confident B = Need Some Support
Resource 1 Stories for the Environment Source: Adapted from Gersie, A. (1992) Earthtales: Storytelling in Times of Change, Green Print, London, pp. 23-30. If the current trend continues, many species could be extinct by the middle of the next century. In many cases, what we call "the wild" is already little more than a mega-zoo. In every country, the land is being over-cultivated, over-grazed, cleared of vegetation and inappropriately irrigated. While more than 40 000 children die every day of malnutrition, more than £2 million per minute is spent on weapons. Most of us want to call a halt to starvation, to poverty, and to the cumulative processes of destruction and species elimination which occur hour upon hour. We try to be aware that we cannot have the species of plants, insects and animals which we removed today from the earth's surface, back tomorrow. When species disappear they are irrevocably lost. Living in a Time of Crisis In times of crisis we are generally blind to everything outside our immediate necessities. How could we be otherwise? Our survival is at stake, we hope to weather the storm by limiting our field of attention. The problem with our current environmental crisis is, firstly, that it does not yet look like much of a crisis; and, secondly, that we have to rethink what we consider our basic necessities to be. The bringing about of change in this particular situation is therefore infinitely complex. We are unable to see clearly on several levels and in several ways. As stated earlier, in a crisis we are blind to everything outside our immediate necessities. Yet it is important not to forget that:
Presently the daily life of a majority of people in the 'North' is quite comfortable. Though most people may be living comfortably, rivers, dolphins, puffins and the poor and homeless people are not. If serious notice were to be taken of their plight the environmental crisis would be in the forefront of everyone's mind. We would also realise that every one is likely to be affected by the magnitude of the environmental problems before too long, irrespective of our status and capabilities. Each living creature or plant will sooner rather than later face substantial difficulties with:
The trouble is 'Before how long?'. The answer is unclear. Some experts give us ten more years to cling to existing satisfactions; others thirty years or even a little longer. Most specialists, however, agree that if current trends continue unchanged, there is no doubt that one day we shall rudely awaken to the fact that immediate and very drastic action will be required to safeguard even our most basic needs such as clean air and clean water. But because we believe that this day has not arrived yet, we are unable to act collectively and constructively to prevent the present situation from worsening, for such are the dynamics of change on a large scale. Unless of course we achieve a dramatic turnabout in human ways of thinking and responding. Then we might learn to prefer prevention over cure. However, until such a turnabout happens we are likely to use one of three major mechanisms to fight off the emergence of the anxiety which results from the demand to change - a demand which is mostly perceived as arising outside of us, instead of internally. To deal with the 'apparent' scare-mongering of environmentalists and concerned scientists we tend to adopt the following mechanisms:
We are likely to hold on to these three forms of denial until our anxiety, fear and guilt has been reduced to tolerable levels or until the anticipated calamity is such that we have to act. Meanwhile we listen to voices like Chris Colwell's, who writes: "Institutions alone can never solve the problems that cumulate from the seemingly inconsequential actions of millions of individuals . . . . As much as we are the root of the problem, we are also the genesis of its solution. Go to it." If we take this advice and 'go to it' we accept that we can help ourselves and others by strengthening our coping and changeability skills. In order to do this we need to set times aside during which:
Then we soon discover that:
Why then do stories matter in this process and how do they contribute to bringing about change? Whenever we listen to a story a special thread of intimacy is created between us, the listeners, and the storyteller. Once the story has captivated our interest, we become enfolded in a private world. The quality of concentration is such that all around are influenced by the prevailing sense of hushedness. We do not wish to disturb the image of completeness evoked by a storyteller and group of listeners temporarily engrossed in an alternative world. The Value of Stories Traditionally stories serve a number of functions:
We experience stress when old habits must be changed, because they no longer work. We feel compelled:
Such stress can be sharply heightened both by the absence of vital information or by an overload of painful information. The consequent confusion and ambiguity diminish our senses of control over our life and behaviour even further. There is little doubt that three-pronged approach to dealing with individual and community stress, which is caused by an unavoidable requirement to change, is most effective. This involves:
Since time immemorial people have used storytelling to enhance these processes. All of us tell stories to some extent in our daily life. We share memories, gossip or retell events we heard about. Traditional stories differ from these personal tales in so far that they have mattered to people often enough and long enough to acquire a more or less consistent form. It is to then traditional stories that we can look for inspiration. Questions for Discussion
Resource 2 The Monk's Story Source: Adapted from Beddis, R. and Johnson, C., eds. (1988) Only One Earth: A Multimedia Education Pack, World Wide Fund for Nature, Godalming. Surrey.
"In another twenty-five years this village will be richer. People will be richer. People will have money in their hands; plants and trees will grow on their lands; houses will have been built; children will be literate and educated. Only then will the people in Galahitiya have the strength to build a pirivena, a proper temple ... But first the environment; then the temple will emerge from that." The Venerable Kiranthidiye Pannasekera Thera is a very unusual monk. At the age of ten he left his family to become a Buddhist novice and live at a temple. With a great love of wildlife and the natural environment, he spent a number of years teaching in rural areas. He always combined his religious duties with practical help for the people he lived with. This might be working in the paddy fields or organising the building of a road. In 1982, the Monk saw in the village of Galahitiya, not simply a village needing a temple, but a very poor community destroying the forest and all the plants and animals in it and with it the soil which they needed to grow crops. The monk saw that the village needed his help, not only as a religious leader, but also in practical ways. The Buddha taught that a hungry man cannot think of religious matters so the Monk decided that his first job was to help the villagers to improve their lives. He also knew that because he was respected as a monk, people would listen to him and that he might be able to get the government and other organisations to help the village. Many of the villages in Sri Lanka do not grow much food for sale and therefore do not have a high income. However, they often have a good quality of life, they have most of the things they need to produce enough food to stay healthy even in times of drought or flood. In many villages there is a dispensary for medicines, good care of young children and most people live a long and healthy life. In Galahitiya however, the Monk did not find one of Sri Lankas prosperous villages ... One of the first things that the Monk did was to carry out a complete survey of the village. He discovered that Galahitiya is not a tight cluster of houses like the villages we know. He found the houses spread across the hillsides so that you can stand in the middle of the village without realising that you are there. He found this village was almost totally cut off from the surrounding towns and had to provide almost all of its needs from among its people. There was no school or dispensary. The villagers had to cross the river by boat and then walk several miles before they could catch a bus to the nearest hospital. Most of the houses were made of wattle and daub (interwoven twigs coated in clay) with a mud floor and thatched or in some cases a tin roof. There were not wells in the village and the people collected water from the river or springs. Flies, lice and mosquitoes were to be found throughout the village and the people were only just able to grow enough food to feed themselves in a good year. Floods or droughts frequently upset the balance between food production and the amount needed to survive. About one quarter of the people relied on government food subsidies all year round. The village lies in the wet zone of Sri Lanka where there is not a clear dry season and therefore crops cannot be grown all year round. However, the village is on the mountain slopes in a forested area with poor soils. About 100 families had settled in the area when the Monk first went there. They had simply moved onto an area of forest and cut down and burned the trees so that they could plant their crops. There is not enough land in this part of Sri Lanka. The growth of population has made people move to this forest area where they are really squatters on government forest land. The type of farming used in Galahitiya is called 'chena' cultivation and it is also practised in the dry zone of Sri Lanka to the north and east. In earlier times in the dry zone crops such as maize, cassava, chillies, bananas and beans were grown for a year or two. After that, the forest was allowed to regrow for 15 or 20 years. As only small plots were being cleared for 'chena' cultivation, entire hillsides were never left bare to erode away in the rains. But in Galahitiya, the Monk found families practising 'chena' without leaving the forests time to recover. In Buddhism, a respect for all life is encouraged so it is hardly surprising that the Monk became very upset. "From my pansala I could see the forests being burnt for chena. And I felt pain in my heart. With every blaze that lit the sky I could feel the destruction being caused. For me the destruction of the trees and plant life amounts to the destruction of life itself. I knew the destruction of trees and forests was an important factor in causing floods." By removing the tree cover on the surrounding slopes the villages have exposed the soil to the very heavy monsoon rains and this is having a disastrous effect on the environment. Without the tree leaves to stop the rain, water beats against the bare soil and washes the soil into the rivers. Here, the silt (fine soil) fills the river bed making flooding more common. During floods the paths and tracks are submerged under water and the people cannot go anywhere; the fields are flooded and crops are often destroyed. The removal of the tree roots and the washing away of the soil also reduces the amount of water that is stored in the soil - so this too leads to more water washing over the hill slopes and carrying away soil. With less water stored in the soil, when there is a dry period some of the springs dry up and the level of water in the rivers falls quickly. The Monk could see that this widespread forest destruction and soil erosion would eventually stop the villagers from growing crops. There was also the risk of landslides. Some years before the Monk had seen an area nearby where even more forest had been removed and where a landslide after heavy rain had buried several houses killing 40 people. But why were the villagers destroying the very land they depended on? The Monk felt he knew the answer. He knew that the villagers needed to cut down the forest now in order to live. Because they were only squatters and did not own the land they could not imagine the future and look after the forest. They might be thrown off the land at any moment. The villagers told the Monk that in 1981 the government foresters came to the area and cut down trees which provided food (such as coconut and jackfruit) in order to plant pines to provide timber in the future. When they planted the pines they destroyed 15 houses because they were in the area where the pines were to be planted. Such incidents remind the villagers of their vulnerability. In such situations there is little incentive to protect and improve the land. The first task that the Monk felt was essential was to obtain legal documents of land ownership for the villagers. It is possible to do this by applying to the correct government department. The village headman, Kudhemis Fernando had tried this, bu the Land Registry Office asked for copies of so many papers that he had not heard of that he gave up. In 1983 the Monk wrote up his original survey in the form of a development proposal for the village. This proposal included the cost of everything from building a road to the village to helping the villagers plant tea bushes and erect new houses. He called this a "Project Proposal for the Development of Galahitiya". This was aimed at anybody who might help the village, from the government, the Local Lions Club, to foreign organisations. The Monk wrote letters asking for land rights, got the villagers to sign them and then sent them to the District Land Office. Because he was a monk the other people with similar requests made way for him and the Land Officer listened carefully to what he had to say. The Monk followed this by more letters not only to the Land Office but also to the Member of Parliament and to the manager of the Agricultural Development Authority. He made frequent visits to the Land Officer until in early 1985, 130 families, including Kudhemis Fernando's, received legal title to an average of 2 acres. In the summer of 1986 a further 115 families received similar documents to say that they now owned the land. No government money has been found for the Monk's development programme for Galahitiya. Even without funding, the villagers built the dirt road that they needed to get to the nearest town for hospitals and schools and to bring in the agricultural experts. The Monk persuaded the Rubber Control Department to supply free rubber trees to the village so that they could produce latex to earn money (a cash crop). He encouraged each farmer to devote an acreof land to a cash crop, half an acre to trees to protect the soil and half an acre to a 'home garden' to grow food crops. The Monks own irrigated garden became a model for the village to follow, with a variety of crops grown in layers to allow exactly the right amount of light to each type of plant. In early 1987, the Monk discovered that the United Nations had declared 1987 to be the 'International Year of Shelter for the Homeless' and that Sri Lanka had established a special programme to help villages build brick houses. The Monk met his MP and asked if Galahitiya could be included in this scheme. The MP promised to do this. One special programme that the Monk started was a tree nursery to grow new trees to replace those that had been cut down in previous years. The young people of the village do most of the work in the tree nursery so in future years there will be a new generation of people used to planting and protecting trees and not cutting them down. By 1987 the nursery had provided 6000 trees for the villagers who then give their time to plant them. Five acres of hillside have been planted with these trees. The Monk is defensive, but not apologetic, about his as yet small contribution to the spiritual life of his community, and his much greater concern for its financial, material, agricultural and environmental development. He found his example in a story from the Buddhist Scriptures: 'Once the Lord Buddha visited a wealthy merchant's household. In the same household was a poor man, hungry and exhausted, who had been out all day searching for to no avail for his only ox, the source of his livelihood. The Buddha was about to preach a sermon when he noticed the poor visitor. The Buddha could tell that the man was ready to grasp his philosophy. But, the Buddha thought, this man is starving, and a starving man will not be able to follow my sermon. So he sent the hungry man to his own plate and only then did he preach.' What is happening in Galahitiya could happen in villages all over Sri Lanka and in places all over the world. One person from outside (the Monk) has been the starting point for the people to realise they can change their way of life and improve their conditions. It is the villagers who have built the road and planted the trees. It is the villagers who will build new houses and make other improvements. Of course this cannot go on without help from the government. The villagers will also need help to put a stop to the other groups of people who are destroying the surrounding forests - the Monk has estimated that 80% of the forest destruction in the area was being caused by illegal loggers and legally contracted loggers, about 15% by the villagers and 5% by the Government Forestry Department. Yet it is the villagers who see the need for these things and who want to improve their life. What has happened at Galahitiya is often called a 'small-scale community development programme'. Some people say that programmes like this are not important and that they only affect a few hundred people and that big projects such as hydro-electric power stations are what is needed. But other people feel that because the changes at Galahitiya have been achived by the people of the village, the improvements will last and grow. In 25 years time, Galahitiya may be a prosperous village with plants and trees covering the land, solid houses for all the villagers, a dispensary for medicine and a road to larger towns with hospitals and other facilities. The proper temple that the Monk was sent to the village to build might also appear! What is happening at Galahitiya seems to be a good example of 'sustainable development'. It does not rely on large amounts of money from the government, but on the efforts of the people. Even without any further help, the village would probably remain prosperous because the people now own their land and want to look after the land that provides them with their food. Based on "Only One Earth", Lloyd Timberlake, 1987. BBC / Earthscan. |